Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Capital on the Frontier Best Practices Geographies
Slack Conference Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe
Features
Series
Themes
Community
Data
Subscribe Log In
More

Retail investors are worried about impact, not financial returns



ImpactAlpha, June 18 – Retail investors increasingly believe impact investments can generate sufficient financial returns. It’s the “impact” they’re not so sure about.

The concerns are hampering broader adoption of sustainable exchange-traded funds, fixed-income community notes, listed investment trusts, impact mutual funds, and other mainstream products, according to “The Individual Imperative,” a retail impact investing report from the Rockefeller Foundation. The 200 retail investors and 300 advisory firms surveyed were split between North America and Europe.

“Early innovations in impact investing catered to accredited and institutional investors,” writes Rockefeller’s Saadia Madsbjerg. “The next frontier for impact investing lies with retail investors.”

  • Impact alpha. More than half of investors  see a clear link between financial investment and social returns. “In fact, some make an argument that, by considering impact in the investment process, you can actually do better financially; what’s termed ‘impact alpha,’” says Barclays’ Damian Payiatakis.
  • Impact light. Eight of 10 investors find it difficult or extremely difficult to measure impact and are confused about what is a ‘genuine’ impact investment, say the report’s authors. Many new products are ‘impact’ in labelling only, says Erika Karp of Cornerstone Capital Group. “I think there needs to be more ‘real’ products out there.” The lack of clarity makes it hard for clients to see the difference between products that may look similar. “Customers can see the cost, they can see the financial return,” says Triodos Investment Management’s Hans Stegeman. But “on the social impact aspect, there is no common language.” A common definition for impact and how to measure it can help, says the report (see, “Underwriting – and optimizing – for impact).
  • Nevertheless, they persist. Three-quarters of investors who are aware of impact investing say they currently make impact investments. More than half expect to increase their impact allocations to between 6% and 20% of their portfolios in the next two years.
  • Follow the market. Navigate the impact investing marketplace with ImpactAlpha’s personal finance coverage.

You might also like...