Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Capital on the Frontier Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Frontier Finance Best Practices Geographies
Slack Agent of Impact Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe Log In

Legal & General burnishes ‘stewardship’ credentials with push for aggressive climate action

ImpactAlpha, Oct. 14Out: Quiet engagement with executives. In: naming and shaming recalcitrant corporations. 

As more institutional asset owners look for active “stewardship” of portfolio companies by their asset managers, Legal & General Investment Management has staked out an aggressive position.

“You need a stick,” says John Hoeppner, LGIM’s U.S. stewardship chief. “We’ve found a protest vote against chairmen has been quite effective.”

LGIM is expanding its Climate Pledge ten-fold to include 1,000 companies across 13 sectors. It’s also revamped its scoring system to be more quantitative and transparent, so companies know exactly what to expect. The bottom half of the companies have been already notified that they are lagging. Of those, LGIM will focus its engagement efforts on 60 “fence sitters” from the group that can help shift markets. 

The asset manager will vote against directors “across our entire book” and potentially divest from companies that fall short of its minimum standards. The goal: achieving net-zero by 2050 in line with Paris goals. 

“You’re going to see, in numbers, more directors held accountable and I think you will see faster change, ” Hoeppner told ImpactAlpha.

Flexing muscles

In the last few years, Legal & General Investment Management has staked out a reputation as an asset manager to contend with.

After President Trump announcement the U.S. would pull out of the Paris climate agreement, LGIM launched launched what Hoeppner calls, “engagement, with consequences,” a muscular corporate engagement campaign centered on climate action.

“If you were deemed a laggard, we were going to make your name public,” says Hoeppner. “We were going to vote against your chairman. And we’re going to divest out of our sustainability branded funds.”

Q&A with Jeremy Grantham: Hold fossil fuel companies to account and make them ‘pariahs’


That strategy helped LGIM win a $50 billion mandate from Japan’s huge Government Pension Investment Fund, which has made active stewardship a larger part of its manager selection criteria. LGIM has won plaudits from corporate accountability group Climate Majority for its proxy voting record; in contrast, BlackRock was the least likely to vote against management among major asset managers.

Leaders and laggards among asset managers on climate stewardship

LGIM’s harshest consequence when engagement falls short is an “exclusion list” that bans companies inclusion in the firm’s sustainable funds. 

Currently on the exclusion list: ExxonMobil, Hormel, Kroger, Sysco, Rosneft Oil, KEPCO, Loblaw, MetLife, Japan Post Holdings and China Construction Bank. Subaru was reinstated this year after improving on three out of five metrics. 

Climate progress

A perhaps surprising standout in climate progress is mining conglomerate BHP, which is phasing out its thermal coal assets and has forged partnerships to support the decarbonization of steel and shipping. Oil major BP is becoming known for its ambitious strategy to shift away from fossil fuels. 

In the finance sector, Lloyds Banking Group will cut by half the carbon it finances over the next decade, and Chubb and Commonwealth Bank of Australia have vowed to halt coal financing. 

Overall climate scores have increased across most sectors since 2016, with utilities marking the biggest gains and food retail lagging.

You might also like...