Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Capital on the Frontier Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Frontier Finance Best Practices Geographies
Slack Agent of Impact Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe
Features
Series
Themes
Community
Data
Subscribe Log In
More

Realizing the risk of ignoring shareholder climate resolutions



ImpactAlpha, May 21 – Massive flooding in Midland, Michigan on Wednesday threatened to release chemicals from a Dow chemical complex, where products ranging from Saran Wrap to Agent Orange have been produced over years, and an adjacent Superfund site. It’s the kind of nightmare scenario that imperils public health as well as corporate value, and one that investor groups have been sounding the alarm on as global warming increases the frequency of severe weather events.

“This should be a warning sign,” says Lila Holzman of As You Sow. 

The group filed a resolution last year asking Dow (then DowDuPont) to report public health risks of “expanding their petrochemical operations in areas increasingly prone to climate change-induced storms, flooding, and sea level rise.”

The vote didn’t garner much support, but the unfolding crisis could elevate the issue at Chevron and Exxon, which face similar votes at their annual shareholder meetings next week. More than half of shareholders voted in favor of flood-risk reporting at Phillips 66 in early May. 

Chemical risk

During Hurricane Harvey, oil refineries and chemical plants released roughly two million pounds of hazardous pollutants. Almost 40 new petrochemical projects are now underway, most in the flood-prone Gulf region, according to The Environmental Integrity Project, as oil and gas companies look to petrochemicals to prop up demand for oil and gas.

Exxon alone is spending $20 billion on chemical and other expansion projects as part of its ‘Growing the Gulf’ initiative. 

Fossil fuel funding

As You Sow chalked up a symbolic win on Tuesday when half of JPMorgan Chase shareholders supported its resolution asking the bank, the world’s biggest fossil fuel financier, to disclose how it will reduce the climate impact of its lending. Former Exxon chief and longtime Chase director Lee Raymond was re-elected to the bank’s board despite a concerted investor effort to oust him.

BlackRock in the hot seat

At its general meeting today, shareholders will weigh in on some high-profile proposals. One, filed by As You Sow, asks BlackRock to detail how it plans to implement the Business Roundtable’s new statement of corporate purpose, which prioritizes a company’s employees, customers, suppliers and communities alongside their shareholders.

Another asks the $7 trillion asset manager to explain its climate-related proxy voting record. Despite public pronouncements by BlackRock’s Larry Fink about climate risk, the company backed just 6 of 52  such resolutions last year, according to the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, which filed the proposal. 

You might also like...