Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Capital on the Frontier Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Frontier Finance Best Practices Geographies
Slack Agent of Impact Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe Log In

Inside the portfolios of impact investing’s 100% network

The second report is out on a group of investors who have committed to moving 100% of the assets of at least one seven-, eight-, or nine-digit portfolio to impact investments.

The report from Toniic’s 100% impact network includes portfolio data from 76 asset owners who have collectively deployed $2.3 billion. The portfolios range in size from $2 million to more than $500 million; all but six have less than $29.5 million in assets. On average, the portfolios are 75% invested for impact; more than 30 have more than 90% in impact investments. Takeaways from “T100 Powered Ascent”:

  • Global goals. More than 8 in 10 of the investors in the study say they’ve met or exceeded their impact performance expectations. The three most-cited Sustainable Development Goals are No. 11 (sustainable cities and communities), No. 7 (affordable and clean energy) and No. 17 (partnerships for the goals).
  • Commercial returns. Nearly three-quarters of the portfolios target commercial returns overall, though most make some sub-commercial investments as well. Eight in 10 report they’ve met or exceeded their financial performance expectations.
  • More measurement. Six in 10 portfolios now measure impact, up from four in 10 two years ago.
  • Asset allocations. Impact investors in the study are overweighted in private equity investments and underweighted in hedge funds, compared to the asset allocations of non-impact portfolios. Foundations have nearly double the allocation to public equities and fixed income than other investors; private equity is most common for family offices.
  • Local focus. African investors predominately invested in Africa, Asian investors in Asia, Europeans in Europe and so on.

Impact investing “lenses” are proliferating. Suzanne Biegel uses a gender lens. RS Group, a climate lens. Ditte Lysgaard Vind, circular economy principles. Nidal Eses, Eric Rassman and Talia Arnow are guided by the caring economy. Lorrie Meyercord has adopted Laura Callanan’s creative economy lens.

You might also like...