Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Capital on the Frontier Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Frontier Finance Best Practices Geographies
Slack Agent of Impact Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe
Features
Series
Themes
Community
Data
Subscribe Log In
More

Active fund managers fret as investors pour money into “passive” ESG funds



ImpactAlpha, July 29 – Net inflows to low-cost, passively managed environmental, social, and governance funds totaled $12.7 billion in 2019, compared to $8.7 billion for their actively managed counterparts. What’s more, passive ESG funds analyzed by Morningstar outperformed active ESG funds in 2019 and the first quarter of 2020. 

“The advent of passive ESG funds provides more options to investors seeking sustainable impact, and we encourage these fund managers to make commitments to comprehensive ESG approaches,” said Meg Voorhes of US SIF, which compiled the stats in its new report, The Rise of ESG in Passive Investing.

Climate benchmarks

The European Union is developing two benchmarks that dovetail with EU decarbonization goals (the Climate Transition Benchmark) and emissions reductions aligned with the Paris agreement (the Paris-Aligned Benchmark). Switzerland’s Qontigo has launched the first indexes based on the benchmarks. 

Index Impact: Passive investors are actively tilting stock indexes toward sustainability

Active Stewardship

Engagement with company management is one of the few ways passive ESG funds can distinguish themselves. Among the best practices for passive ESG funds identified by US SIF are  clear ESG disclosure, aligned proxy voting, impact measurement and reporting, and company engagement. “Passive fund managers can also communicate with companies to improve their ESG policies and practices through in-person meetings, phone conversations or letter writing/email campaigns,” says the report.  

Tilting the index

As large “universal” asset owners push for sustainable alternatives, asset managers are tweaking the indexes that underlie their passive funds. BlackRock’s Larry Fink has promised to offer sustainable versions of its flagship indexes and shift from a traditional market cap weighting to ones tilted towards ESG factors.

With indexes and stewardship, BlackRock pledges to retool passive investing for climate action

You might also like...