Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Capital on the Frontier Best Practices Geographies
Slack Conference Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe
Features
Series
Themes
Community
Data
Subscribe Log In
More

Overheard at The Economist’s New York impact investing event



Headliners at the magazine’s second annual gathering seemed to find their voice in rebutting stubborn assumptions.

‘Can investors revive the American Dream?’ and other weighty questions of the day

  • Pigeonly founder Frederick Hutson was asked why his startup helping families communicate with inmates was an “impact” company and not just good capitalism. “I don’t look like a typical tech founder,” said Hutson, who is African American and was formerly incarcerated. “Before impact investors backed me, mainstream investors wouldn’t give me the time of day.”
  • Debra Schwartz, charged with deploying $500 million in program-related investments for the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, didn’t bite when asked if there is a tradeoff between impact and return. “We’re not here to prove there’re no tradeoffs,” Schwartz said. “We want to know where they are, why they’re needed and what levers to pull.”
  • Liesel Pritzker Simmons, who leads the $500 million Blue Haven Initiative family office, said there’s no contradiction between investing in women and maximizing shareholder value. “If you want to maximize shareholder value, you better be having this discussion.”
  • Village Capital’s Ross Baird challenged the premise of a question about whether impact investing is going mainstream. Even Henry Ford tried to create good-paying jobs in Michigan so workers could buy cars, he said. “We’re getting back to how business used to be.”
  • But impact products can’t scale to attract the trillions of dollars needed to finance the sustainable development goals, can they? Yes they can, said Rockefeller Foundation’s Saadia Madsbjerg. There will be products, she said, that “the NGOs can stand behind, that pension funds can put money in and that fund managers can execute.”

You might also like...