Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Capital on the Frontier Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Frontier Finance Best Practices Geographies
Slack Agent of Impact Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe Log In

Helping companies tap ‘alternative capital’ for sustainable growth

Last week, we flagged the new demand for the “demand dividend” as an alternative to venture capital-style investment terms. ImpactAlpha’s archive includes examples of the revenue-based repayment structure, which allows investors and entrepreneurs to share risk and create liquidity events.

‘Demand dividend’ emerges as alternative to venture capital financing

“We’re huge fans and advocates for these alternatives,” tweeted Aner Ben-Ami, managing director at the Candide Group. “We’ve also learned these profit/rev shares work only in a limited set of cases.” Ben-Ami’s use cases:

  • Later-stage financing. Revenue-share structures that work for later-stage companies may be harder to adapt to earlier stage companies, says Ben-Ami. For smaller companies, says Ben-Ami, “the growth trajectory required to repay investors starts to look a lot like the kind of ‘hockey stick’ projections that the venture capitalists are looking for.”
  • Other alternatives. For companies that are too big for revenue share, but too small for VC funding, equity buybacks, or redemptions, might be a better fit. With equity redemptions, investors buy shares and hold them until the company is able to repurchase them, via lower cost debt, for example. One advantage: “Investors are not taking money out of the company during the crucial early years of growth, and instead are reinvesting into the business,” Ben-Ami says.
  • Selecting the right capital. Cathy Clack and CASE at Duke’s Fuqua School of Business have compiled more than a dozen financing mechanisms, including variable repayment debt, recoverable grants, convertible notes and crowdfunded equity. Their Smart Impact Capital platform helps entrepreneurs raise the right type of capital for any stage, geography, industry and impact area.

You might also like...