Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Capital on the Frontier Best Practices Geographies
Slack Conference Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe
Features
Series
Themes
Community
Data
Subscribe Log In
More

UC to shed “risky” fossil fuels from $83 billion of funds



ImpactAlpha, Sept. 17 – University of California students have waged a long-running campaign to divest the school’s $13.4 billion endowment from fossil fuels. In July, its faculty voted to support such a move. On Tuesday, they got a two-fer. In an op-ed in the LA Times, UC chief investment officer and treasurer Jagdeep Singh Bachher and UC Board of Regents’ Investments Committee chair Richard Sherman said the endowment would be fossil-free by month’s end and that university’s $70 billion pension fund would follow. Their clear-eyed analysis: “We believe hanging on to fossil fuel assets is a financial risk.”

  • Fossil-free club. UC joins a growing number of institutions divesting from fossil fuels. Since 2014, assets committed to divestment have increased 22,000%, from $52 billion to more than $11 trillion today, according to 350.org, which helped catalyze the divestment movement.
  • Fiduciary duty. The fund managers wanted to make clear they were acting in the financial interests of UC. “The reason we sold some $150 million in fossil fuel assets from our endowment was the reason we sell other assets: They posed a long-term risk to generating strong returns for UC’s diversified portfolios.” 
  • Beyond divestment. “We have been looking years, decades and centuries ahead as we place our bets that clean energy will fuel the world’s future. That means we believe there is money to be made,” wrote Bachher and Sherman. “We have chosen to invest for a better planet, and reap the financial rewards for UC, rather than simply divest for a headline.”
  • Policy by op-ed? Pressure from UC faculty members appears to have spurred the announcement. The $1 billion in clean and renewable investments is significant, but recent equity divestment activity has mostly been limited to the smaller endowment fund. The carbon footprint of UC’s equity portfolio actually increased in 2018 over 2017, the university says.

You might also like...