Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Capital on the Frontier Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Frontier Finance Best Practices Geographies
Slack Conference Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe
Features
Series
Themes
Community
Data
Subscribe Log In
More

ImpactBase Snapshot: Funds Have Raised Less than Half Their Targets



Our friends over at ImpactBase have published the first analysis of the more than 300 impact funds in the database. Their conclusion: most impact investing funds remain young and hungry.

The analysis, released by the Global Impact Investing Network, which operates ImpactBase, found that a whopping 70 percent have been launched since 2009. Only 13 percent were founded before 2006.  Among the 179 funds that reported on committed capital, the average fund has raised less than 50 percent of its fundraising target.

Other highlights of the report (not to be confused with with the annual GIIN/JP Morgan market survey):

  • Market rate. ”More than 75 percent of the funds target returns comparable to traditional investments of a similar risk-return profile,” write the report’s authors.
  • Composition. Private Equity/Venture Capital funds represent approximately half of the funds profiled on ImpactBase. About 20 percent of funds are fixed income, while 20 percent also invest using multiple instruments.
  • Track Record. Over 40 percent of funds in ImpactBase report 3+ years of track record.
  • Impact Metrics. Ninety-six percent of ImpactBase funds use performance metrics to quantify their social and environmental impact. More than half track IRIS-compatible metrics.
  • Exits. More than half of the fixed-income deals reported in ImpactBase have been exited. This compares with 14 percent for PE/VC and just 2 percent for real assets. (The GIIN notes: The term ‘exits’ should be interpreted in context: In the case of fixed income, an exit could be the repayment of a loan which, for a revolving loan fund for instance, could lead to a high number of reported ‘exits.’)

In a footnote, the GIIN notes the ImpactBase dataset may be biased towards newer funds that are actively seeking investment and may not include many older funds that have not raised additional capital since the database was launched in 2011.

You might also like...