Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Capital on the Frontier Best Practices Geographies
Slack Conference Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe
Features
Series
Themes
Community
Data
Subscribe Log In
More

How GE and its investors misjudged the energy transition



ImpactAlpha, July 22 – A sweltering heat wave gripped much of the U.S. this weekend. June was the hottest month on record, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The spiking temperatures provide a stark reminder that corporations and investors ignore the shift away from fossil fuels to more sustainable energy at their (and the planet’s) peril.

General Electric’s missteps in the energy market serve as a cautionary tale, according to a report from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. GE “is a case study in how rapidly the global energy transition away from fossil fuels travels up the economic chain and destroys value,” say the authors. 

  • Impact omega. GE lost $193 billion, or 74%, of its market value from 2016 to 2018. The authors chalk up the value-destruction in large part to GE’s ill-timed acquisition of Alstom’s thermal power division in 2015, just as world leaders committed to reducing emissions and thermal demand began to soften. GE last year took a $23 billion write-down for the unit’s goodwill—roughly double its purchase price just three years earlier. 
  • Shareholder neglect. GE’s largest shareholders, including BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and Fidelity, suffered massive losses, $11 billion for BlackRock investors alone over a three-year period. The report calls out shareholders for failing to grasp the global transition to clean energy. “BlackRock owned 5.7% of GE’s stock and so should have been a more active and well‑informed owner,” said IEEFA’s Tom Sanzillo (see, “Impact investors join forces to call on GE to lead the clean-energy transition). 
  • Stranded assets. “The equity and debt write-offs at GE, and in the European utility sector and Indian thermal power generation sector over the last decade, are just a taste of the potential stranded asset losses to come,” conclude the authors. 
  • Catch up. Last week, GE and BlackRock teamed to spin out Distributed Solar Development from GE. The company, 20% owned by GE Renewable Energy and 80% owned by a fund managed by BlackRock, will build, own and operate distributed solar and storage solutions for customers. “There was a lot of debate about what I was doing,” said Erik Schiemann, who launched the business within GE in 2012. “I argued that if we don’t try to disrupt our own business, someone else will.” 

You might also like...