Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Capital on the Frontier Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Frontier Finance Best Practices Geographies
Slack Agent of Impact Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe
Features
Series
Themes
Community
Data
Subscribe Log In
More

Bono challenges impact investing for being “hippy-ish” about financial performance…while others debate impact



At last week’s Skoll World Forum in Oxford, England, the music icon doubled down on his diss of impact investing as an excuse “for good people to do bad deals” (see video). If we want to really have an impact, “we can’t be hippy-ish about this. This isn’t camp,” he said in an interview with Jeff Skoll.

Bono is an investor in and sits on the board of TPG’s Rise Fund (Skoll’s also an investor in the fund), which is seeking to raise $2 billion and, presumably, will be the exception to his critique.

It’s not clear whether Bono’s list of do-gooders/bad dealmakers includes the A-list Silicon Valley billionaires who are backing the fund (see, “Billionaires’ Ball: Deconstructing TPG’s $2 billion RISE Fund”).

In a tweet, Nonprofit Finance Fund’s Antony Bugg-Levine called Bono’s quote an “unfortunate soundbite: plays like one of those lines that optimizes for wit over insight.”

Root Capital’s Michael McCreless wrote that no one actually knows whether most impact investments succeed because impact reporting is so poor. “From the outside, it’s incredibly hard to tell good ‘market-rate impact investing’ from ‘impact-washing’,” he writes.

Debate: Has impact investing has left impact behind?

Oxfam’s recent report questioning whether the “mainstreaming” of impact investing is compromising actual impact also stirred debate at the Skoll World Forum (see video).

Lisa Kleissner, co-founder of Toniic, the impact investing network, agreed with the suggestion in the report, “Impact Investing: Who Are We Serving?” that better impact data and reporting tools are needed.

She said the pressure for financial performance came from a need in the field’s early days to prove that impact investing wasn’t just dressed-up philanthropy.

“We were pushed to the wall to demonstrate the return part,” Kleissner said in a panel discussion. “We didn’t get into impact investing to do that. What was really miraculous is that we made money doing it.”

This post originally appeared in ImpactAlpha’s daily newsletter. Get The Brief.

Photo credit: Skoll World Forum / YouTube

You might also like...