Small logo Subscribe to leading news on impact investing. Learn More
The Brief Originals Dealflow Signals The Impact Alpha Impact Voices Podcasts Agents of Impact Open
What's Next Capital on the Frontier Measure Better Investing in Racial Equity Beyond Trade-offs Impact en las Americas New Revivalists
Local and Inclusive Climate Finance Catalytic Capital Frontier Finance Best Practices Geographies
Slack Conference Calls Events Contribute
The Archive ImpactSpace The Accelerator Selection Tool Network Map
About Us FAQ Calendar Pricing and Payment Policy Privacy Policy Terms of Service Agreement Contact Us
Locavesting Entrepreneurship Gender Smart Return on Inclusion Good Jobs Creative economy Opportunity Zones Investing in place Housing New Schooled Well Being People on the Move Faith and investing Inclusive Fintech
Clean Energy Farmer Finance Soil Wealth Conservation Finance Financing Fish
Innovative Finance
Personal Finance Impact Management
Africa Asia Europe Latin America Middle East Oceania/Australia China Canada India United Kingdom United States
Subscribe Log In

Acumen Fund’s Transparent Experiment

Can impact investing survive the disclosure of impact investment performance?

Few impact funds publicly report the operating results of their portfolio companies — even on an aggregated, anonymized basis. To be sure, accurate valuations of social enterprises can be hard to pin down. But there’s also fear that showcasing the real numbers might snuff the enthusiasm of other investors to even give impact a try.

Acumen Fund, one of the earliest social venture funds, shows that it’s possible to open up a little more and survive. Tucked into a report it issued last spring were details that showed Acumen’s portfolio companies have an average after-tax loss of 20 percent. Its eight most profitable investments returned profits of just 6 percent.

“The dirty secret is, I’m not seeing a lot of people making money in this field,” Jacqueline Novogratz, Acumen’s founder and CEO, said when the report was released.

The news that Acumen expects only a 1x return — simply, the return of its capital — was not a surprise to its backers, who are generally philanthropic funders. The report notes, however, that such returns are “far off the expectations of mainstream financial-first investors.”

Novogratz said Acumen has gotten a positive response to the report. “The fact is, these companies face tremendous challenges,” she said in an e-mail exchange.

Acumen used its own experience to illuminate the need for “enterprise philanthropy” to help social ventures weather the early years of developing products, refining often-novel business models and stoking customer demand. Showing the need for below-market risk capital at the seed stage, Novogratz said, “paints a more accurate picture of what is happening on the ground.”

As a nonprofit with philanthropic support, Acumen’s situation differs from for-profit venture funds that raise money from more conventional institutional investors. And as a public charity with multiple donors, Acumen has more reasons to disclose its portfolio performance than an impact fund financed by a single investor. For example, there’s little public information about the portfolio performance of the Omidyar Network, the hybrid for-profit investment fund and non-profit foundation solely backed by Pierre Omidyar, the founder of eBay, and his wife, Pam.

All the same, Acumen doesn’t plan to make a regular events out of the public the disclosure of the twice-yearly accounting of portfolio performance, though it shares the results at its own investor gatherings. Says spokeswoman Yasmina Zaidman, “Our portfolio performance remains in the range of our target of 1x, and is secondary to the social impact of the companies.”

You might also like...